Shannon v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice , 258 F. App'x 583 ( 2007 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1414
ANDREW SHANNON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
JUVENILE JUSTICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00413-JRS)
Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis McKinley Hairston, Jr., THE GEE LAW FIRM, P.C., Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant. Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General of
Virginia, Maureen Riley Matsen, Deputy Attorney General, Peter R.
Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General/Chief, Gregory C.
Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Shannon appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his retaliation
claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Shannon v. Virginia Dep’t of Juvenile Justice, No. 3:06-cv-
00413-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -