United States v. Mears ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 00-6764
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RICHARD DEAN MEARS,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    No. 00-6765
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RICHARD DEAN MEARS,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
    trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
    Judge; Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-84-218, CA-99-
    288-1, CR-84-194, CA-99-269-1)
    Submitted:   November 30, 2000            Decided:   December 6, 2000
    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard Dean Mears, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    In these consolidated cases, Richard Mears seeks to appeal the
    district court’s orders denying his motions filed under 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
     (West Supp. 2000).    We have reviewed the records and the
    district court’s opinions accepting the recommendations of the mag-
    istrate judge and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we deny
    certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the rea-
    soning of the district court.   See United States v. Mears, Nos. CR-
    84-218; CA-99-288-1; CR-84-194; CA-99-269-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29,
    2000).   We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-6764

Filed Date: 12/6/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014