Hudson v. Attorney General NC ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7227
JIMMY DALE HUDSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-98-948)
Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Dale Hudson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Dale Hudson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hudson’s
motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Hudson v. Attorney Gen.,
No. CA-98-948 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2