Eury v. Mayo ( 2002 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7486
MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MAYO, sued in individual capacity; MARTIN,
sued in individual capacity; F. FIELDS, sued
in individual capacity; JOHNSON, sued in indi-
vidual capacity; MR. GLENDE, sued in individ-
ual capacity; A. JONES, sued in individual
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-94-2)
Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) complaint. The court dismissed Eury’s complaint because he
failed to comply with an order directing him to either submit an
adequate number of copies of the complaint or pay $5.50 for copying
fees. Because Eury may proceed with this action by supplying an
adequate number of copies of the complaint or paying the requisite
fee, the order in question is not a final, appealable order. See
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,
1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2