Currier v. Food Lion Store No. 1202 , 53 F. App'x 255 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-2085
    RICHARD S. CURRIER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FOOD LION STORE NO. 1202, MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH
    CAROLINA,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.   C. Weston Houck, District Judge.
    (CA-02-1886-4-12-BH)
    Submitted:   December 16, 2002          Decided:    December 19, 2002
    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Richard S. Currier, Appellant Pro Se.     Robert E. Lee, Florence,
    South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Richard S. Currier seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
    remanding his civil action back to state court and denying his
    motion to reconsider.       This court may exercise jurisdiction only
    over    final   orders,    
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
       (2000),   and     certain
    interlocutory and collateral orders. 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2000); Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
     (1949).     The orders Currier seeks to appeal are neither final
    orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.               See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1447
    (d) (2000) (noting that remand orders generally are
    not reviewable on appeal).       Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
    lack of jurisdiction.       We also deny Currier’s pending motions to
    proceed   in    forma   pauperis,   for   “Notice    and   Modification   and
    Correction of Record,” to supplement the record, and for “Notice
    and Motion for Joinder Order.”            We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2085

Citation Numbers: 53 F. App'x 255

Judges: Luttig, Michael, Motz

Filed Date: 12/19/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024