Stoyanov v. Winter ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-1900
    ALEKSANDR J. STOYANOV,
    Plaintiff – Appellant,
    v.
    DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy; STEPHAN W. PETRI,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of the
    Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his
    Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70; GERALD SMITH,
    Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Head of
    Code 70 Carderock Division; M. KATHLEEN FOWLER, Individually
    and in her Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code
    709; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official
    Capacity as the Head of Code 74; JAMES H. KING, Individually
    and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74
    Carderock Division; JOHN C. DAVIES, Individually and in his
    Official Capacity as the Deputy Head of Code 74; STEPHAN M.
    FARLEY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the
    Head of Code 741; ROGER P. FORD, Individually and in his
    Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7014 Carderock
    Division; DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official
    Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39,
    Defendants – Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06-
    cv-01245-AMD)
    Submitted:    December 15, 2009             Decided:   December 17, 2009
    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Aleksandr J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se.    John Walter Sippel,
    Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Aleksandr   J.    Stoyanov    appeals   the    district    court’s
    order dismissing his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights
    Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006),
    the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended,
    
    29 U.S.C. §§ 621
     to 634 (2006), the Whistleblower Protection
    Act, 
    5 U.S.C. §§ 1214
    , 1221 and 2302 (2006), and various state
    law tort claims, as well as its order denying his Fed. R. Civ.
    P.   59(e)   motion   for     reconsideration.       We    have   reviewed   the
    record and find no reversible error.           Accordingly, we affirm the
    district court’s orders.          See Stoyanov v. Winter, No. 1:06-cv-
    01245-AMD (D. Md. July 6, 2009; July 14, 2009).                     We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately    presented     in   the   materials     before   the    court   and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-1900

Filed Date: 12/17/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014