Corbin v. Wheeler , 354 F. App'x 763 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7597
    BARBARA LEONE CORBIN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    BARBARA J. WHEELER, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:09-cv-00270-sgw-mfu)
    Submitted:    November 19, 2009             Decided:   December 4, 2009
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Barbara Leone Corbin, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Barbara      Leone       Corbin       seeks    to     appeal   the     district
    court’s order dismissing as untimely her 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006)
    petition.       The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
    or    judge    issues       a    certificate         of   appealability.            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).               A certificate of appealability will not
    issue     absent       “a       substantial       showing       of     the    denial       of    a
    constitutional         right.”            
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)       (2006).          A
    prisoner       satisfies           this        standard       by     demonstrating            that
    reasonable       jurists         would     find      that     any     assessment         of     the
    constitutional         claims      by     the    district      court     is   debatable          or
    wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
    court is likewise debatable.                     Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000);
    Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                                       We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Corbin has
    not     made    the    requisite          showing.           Accordingly,       we       deny    a
    certificate       of     appealability           and      dismiss      the    appeal.            We
    dispense       with     oral       argument       because       the     facts    and          legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7597

Citation Numbers: 354 F. App'x 763

Judges: Motz, Gregory, Shedd

Filed Date: 12/4/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024