Gantt-El v. Anderson ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7217
    GEORGE W. GANTT-EL,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    RICKY ANDERSON,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Donald P. Dietrich,
    Magistrate Judge. (1:09-cv-00040-UA-DPD)
    Submitted:    November 19, 2009             Decided:   December 2, 2009
    Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    George W. Gantt-El, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    George       W.     Gantt-El       seeks     to      appeal          the    district
    court’s       orders       (1)     denying    him       leave      to        proceed      in     forma
    pauperis       in    his     action    filed          pursuant     to        
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
    (2006),       and    ordering        him     to       pay   the     $5       filing       fee,      and
    (2) granting him an extension of time to pay the fee.                                               Our
    review     of       the     district       court       docket      sheet          and     Gantt-El’s
    informal brief on appeal reveals that the filing fee was paid on
    June    16,     2009.        Accordingly,          because        Gantt-El         has     paid     the
    filing     fee,        we     deny     his        motion     for         a        certificate        of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal as moot.                                 We deny leave to
    proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and deny Gantt-El’s motion
    for judicial notice.               We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and    legal       contentions       are       adequately           presented         in   the
    materials       before       the    court     and      argument         would       not     aid     the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7217

Filed Date: 12/2/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014