Alexander Development Corp. v. Muhammad ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-1267
    ALEXANDER   DEVELOPMENT      CORPORATION;     MCSHEA    MANAGEMENT
    INCORPORATED,
    Plaintiffs – Appellees,
    v.
    RAHEEM MUHAMMAD,
    Defendant – Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.    Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
    (8:09-cv-00132-DKC)
    Submitted:    November 5, 2009              Decided:   December 17, 2009
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Raheem Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.   Kevin Bernard McParland,
    BREGMAN BERBERT SCHWARTZ AND GILDAY, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland,
    for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order remanding this case back to state court.                              Because the
    remand order was based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction,
    we     conclude    we    lack    jurisdiction        over     this    appeal.        See
    
    28 U.S.C. § 1447
    (d) (2006); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca,
    
    516 U.S. 124
    ,    127-28       (1995);      Ellenburg    v.    Spartan     Motors
    Chassis, Inc., 
    519 F.3d 192
    , 196 (4th Cir. 2008); Borneman v.
    United States, 
    213 F.3d 819
    , 824-25 (4th Cir. 2000).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.                  We dispense with
    oral    argument       because       the    facts   and   legal      contentions     are
    adequately      presented       in    the    materials    before      the    court   and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2