Ndenge v. Mukasey , 293 F. App'x 225 ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1227
BEDES TAMASANG NDENGE,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: August 22, 2008 Decided: September 15, 2008
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, Petitioner Pro Se. Andrew Brinkman, Craig
William Kuhn, Trial Attorney, Elizabeth Joanne Stevens, Senior
Litigation Counsel, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,
for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to reopen. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ndenge (B.I.A. Jan. 30,
2008). We deny Ndenge’s motion to reopen and remand to the
immigration judge. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2