United States v. Harris ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7515
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:06-cr-00100-FL-2)
Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A.
Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith Harris appeals a district court order denying
his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Harris was
not entitled to a reduction because after considering Amendment
706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Harris’ range of imprisonment
remained the same, the mandatory minimum sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm.
We deny Harris’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2