United States v. Sims ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-7164
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JERMAINE JERRELL SIMS, a/k/a Justice, a/k/a Jus,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (3:98-cr-00045-CMH-1)
    Submitted:    November 13, 2008            Decided:   November 20, 2008
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Appellant Pro Se.      Nicholas Stephan
    Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond,
    Virginia, Kenneth E. Melson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jermaine   Jerrell    Sims     seeks    to    appeal       the    district
    court’s   order    denying    relief       on   his   Motion       for    Independent
    Action for Relief from Judgment.                The order is not appealable
    unless    a   circuit    justice    or     judge     issues    a    certificate       of
    appealability.      
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).                 A certificate of
    appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of
    the denial of a constitutional right.”                 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)
    (2000).       A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating
    that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the
    constitutional     claims    by    the   district      court       is    debatable   or
    wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
    court is likewise debatable.             Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000);
    Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                              We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sims has not
    made the requisite showing.          Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                   We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-7164

Filed Date: 11/20/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021