United States v. Said ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7168
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MOHAMMED ASAD SAID,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:03-cr-00556-TSE-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammed Asad Said, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mohammed Asad Said appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct judgment and commitment order. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Said, No. 1:03-cr-00556-TSE-1 (E.D. Va.
Apr. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
See Baca v. United States, 383 F.2d 154, 157 (10th Cir.
1967) (where the oral judgment is ambiguous, the written
judgment and commitment order may be used to clarify the
intention of the sentencing judge); see also United States v.
Morse, 344 F.2d 27, 30 (4th Cir. 1965) (the court “should carry
out the true intention of the sentencing judge as this may be
gathered from what he said at the time of sentencing.”).
2