Larry Williams v. Wayne McCabe , 460 F. App'x 207 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                  UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-7037
    LARRY WILLIAMS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WAYNE C. MCCABE, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution,
    Respondent - Appellee,
    and
    CHARLES T.      BROOKS,   III;    BUBBER   JENKINSON;      CAROLYN   F.
    WILLIAMS,
    Respondents.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.     Margaret B. Seymour, District
    Judge. (3:11-cv-00946-MBS)
    Submitted:   December 20, 2011                 Decided:   December 23, 2011
    Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Larry Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006) petition.
    The    district    court    referred      this    case    to    a    magistrate          judge
    pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2011).
    The    magistrate    judge       recommended      that    relief         be    denied         and
    advised Williams that failure to file timely objections to this
    recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court
    order based upon the recommendation.
    The     timely       filing     of    specific          objections           to     a
    magistrate       judge’s     recommendation        is     necessary           to     preserve
    appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
    the     parties     have     been      warned      of     the        consequences              of
    noncompliance.           Wright v. Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th
    Cir.    1985);     see    also    Thomas v.       Arn,    
    474 U.S. 140
         (1985).
    Williams     has    waived       appellate       review    by       failing         to    file
    objections after receiving proper notice.                      Accordingly, we deny
    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions       are   adequately       presented         in     the      materials
    before    the    court     and   argument      would     not    aid      the       decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-7037

Citation Numbers: 460 F. App'x 207

Judges: Motz, Duncan, Diaz

Filed Date: 12/23/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024