Ameen Kareem Abdullah v. Nathan A. Rice, Warden Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina , 807 F.2d 175 ( 1986 )

807 F.2d 175
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ameen Kareem ABDULLAH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nathan A. RICE, Warden; Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General
of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-6695.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 19, 1986.
Decided Dec. 10, 1986.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Ameen Kareem Abdullah, appellant pro se.

Barry Steven McNeill, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Abdullah v. Rice, C/A No. 83-861-C-C-M (W.D.N.C., July 7, 1986).

2

DISMISSED.