Culp v. United States ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7845
HARVEY CULP, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES PAROLE
COMMISSION; PROSECUTING ATTORNEY; WOODROW
JONES, Judge, "Judge of Judgment"; JOHN DOE,
Judge; MERCER BLANKENSHIP, JR., Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-268-3-MU2)
Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harvey Culp, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Harvey Culp, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Culp v. United States, No. CA-03-268-3-MU2 (W.D.N.C.,
Sept. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -