Miiro v. Gonzales ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1430
ANDREW MIIRO,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A74-642-948)
Submitted: November 16, 2005 Decided: December 6, 2005
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fatai A. Suleman, AMOROW & KUM, P.A., Takoma Park, Maryland, for
Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Douglas
E. Ginsburg, Senior Litigation Counsel, John D. Williams, OFFICE OF
IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Miiro, a native and citizen of Uganda, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings.
We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen.
See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re: Miiro, No. A74-642-948 (B.I.A. Mar. 24, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -