United States v. Grande , 285 F. App'x 104 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-6829
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    OSCAR ANTONIO GRANDE, a/k/a Pantera,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (1:04-cr-00283-GBL-2; 1:06-cv-01022-GBL)
    Submitted:     July 22, 2008                 Decided:   July 28, 2008
    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Lana Marie Manitta, RICH, ROSENTHAL, MANITTA, DZUBIN & KROEGER,
    LLP, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Patricia Tolliver Giles,
    Ronald Leonard Walutes, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys,
    Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Oscar Antonio Grande seeks to appeal the district court’s
    orders denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2000) motion.             The
    orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
    a certificate of appealability.      
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).        A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”               
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).   A   prisoner   satisfies    this   standard    by
    demonstrating    that   reasonable   jurists   would     find   that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.      Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).        We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grande has not
    made the requisite showing.     Accordingly, we deny Grande’s motion
    for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-6829

Citation Numbers: 285 F. App'x 104

Judges: Wilkinson, Motz, Shedd

Filed Date: 7/28/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024