De Leon v. Holder ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 10-1286
    ANGEL DE LEON,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   August 25, 2010             Decided:   September 3, 2010
    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Hugo Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner.    Tony
    West, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant
    Director, Rebecca Hoffberg, Office of Immigration Litigation,
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
    Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Angel     De    Leon,    a     native     and    citizen       of    Guatemala,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals    (“Board”)        dismissing       his     appeal    from       the    immigration
    judge’s denial of his application for adjustment of status.                                 We
    have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and affirm the
    denial of relief for the reasons stated by the Board.                             In re: De
    Leon (B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2010); see Ramirez v. Holder, 
    609 F.3d 331
    ,    335-37    (4th      Cir.    2010)      (holding      that     an    alien     who    is
    inadmissible      under      
    8 U.S.C. § 1182
    (a)(9)(C)(i)(I)            (2006)     is
    ineligible       for   adjustment         of       status    pursuant       to    
    8 U.S.C. § 1255
    (i)       (2006)).          Accordingly,        we     deny    the    petition        for
    review.     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions        are    adequately        presented       in     the    materials
    before    the    court      and    argument        would    not     aid    the    decisional
    process.
    PETITION DENIED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-1286

Filed Date: 9/3/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021