Bernard Richardson v. Dulanes , 691 F. App'x 103 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-6906
    BERNARD RAY RICHARDSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DOCTOR DULANES; N. STANFORD, Head Nurse W.R.S.P.; LESLIE J.
    FLEMING, Warden W.R.S.P.; B. R. RAVIZEE, Grievance Coordinator W.R.S.P.;
    R. H. BIVENS, Grievance Coordinator Western Regional Administrator Office; C.
    L. PARR, Grievance Coordinator Western Regional Administrator Office; NURSE
    BLEDSOE, W.R.S.P.; H. C. RAY, Virginia Department of Corrections Director of
    Health Services; NAME UNKNOWN, Va D.O.C. Director of Health Services,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00356-JCC-TCB)
    Submitted: May 18, 2017                                           Decided: June 1, 2017
    Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Bernard Ray Richardson appeals from the district court’s orders denying his request
    to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and denying his motion for reconsideration.
    The district court found that Richardson did not make a sufficient showing that he was
    under imminent danger of serious physical injury and dismissed his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
    (2012) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (g) (2012). We have
    reviewed the record, including the dismissal orders identified as qualifying strikes pursuant
    to § 1915(g), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed
    on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
    Richardson v. Dulanes, No. 1:16-cv-00356-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2016 & June 1,
    2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-6906

Citation Numbers: 691 F. App'x 103

Judges: Duncan, Floyd, Hamilton, Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/1/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024