United States v. Tenamee , 117 F. App'x 282 ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7575
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
REUVEN TENAMEE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CR-
89-235-JFM)
Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 28, 2004
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reuven Tenamee, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Reuven Tenamee appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to compel production of grand jury testimony. We have
reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion, as Tenamee
demonstrated no particularized need for production. See Dennis v.
United States, 384 U.S. 855, 872 (1966). Accordingly, we affirm
the order of the district court. See United States v. Tenamee, No.
CR-89-235-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -