Clemons v. Commissioner, Soc ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 03-1247
    PHILLIP A. CLEMONS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Danville. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate
    Judge. (CA-02-4-4)
    Submitted:   June 24, 2003                 Decided:   July 21, 2003
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Phillip A. Clemons, Appellant Pro Se.       James Anthony Winn,
    Assistant Regional Counsel, Dina White Griffin, SOCIAL SECURITY
    ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Julie C. Dudley,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Phillip A. Clemons seeks review of the magistrate judge's
    order* affirming the Commissioner's denial of Social Security
    disability insurance benefits to Clemons prior to August 10, 1997,
    based on its finding that Clemons was not totally disabled until
    that date. We review the Commissioner’s final decision to determine
    whether it is supported by substantial evidence and whether the
    correct law was applied.             Pass v. Chater, 
    65 F.3d 1200
    , 1203 (4th
    Cir.        1995).    We   have     reviewed     the   record   and   conclude     the
    Commissioner’s         decision      is   based    upon   substantial       evidence.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.
    See Clemons v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. CA-02-4-4 (W.D.
    Va. Jan. 28, 2003).              We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts       and   legal    contentions     are    adequately    presented     in   the
    materials         before   the    court   and     argument   would    not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    The parties consented to review by a magistrate judge
    pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c)(2) (2000).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-1247

Filed Date: 7/21/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021