Perkins v. Ware ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2599 NELDA A. PERKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES JEROME WARE, Esq.; CHARLES JEROME WARE, Esq. P.A.; CHARLES JEROME WARE, P.A. and Associates, Defendants - Appellees, versus HARRY T. ALEXANDER, Honorable, Third Party Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 93-389-DKC) Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nelda A. Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Martinez, ECCLESTON & WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in a legal malpractice action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perkins v. Ware, No. CA-93-389-DKC (D. Md. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3