Sampson v. Highland County Va Board of Supervisors ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 15-7614
    ROBERT E. SAMPSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    HIGHLAND COUNTY VA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; MAYOR,      City   of
    Monterey; T.J. DUFF, Highland County Sheriff,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.       Glen E. Conrad, Chief
    District Judge. (7:15-cv-00465-GEC-RSB)
    Submitted:   February 18, 2016            Decided:   June 14, 2016
    Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert E. Sampson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Robert      E.   Sampson     seeks    to    appeal       the   district      court’s
    order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
    complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)
    (2012).     This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
    orders,    28    U.S.C.    § 1291     (2012),      and    certain         interlocutory
    orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).                             The
    order Sampson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.                        See Domino Sugar
    Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 
    10 F.3d 1064
    , 1066-67
    (4th Cir. 1993).         Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
    jurisdiction     and     remand    the    case    to    the    district        court   with
    instructions to allow Sampson to file an amended complaint.                             See
    Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 
    807 F.3d 619
    , 630 (4th Cir.
    2015).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions      are     adequately      presented         in   the    materials
    before    this   court    and     argument      would    not    aid      the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED AND REMANDED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-7614

Judges: Wilkinson, Diaz, Floyd

Filed Date: 6/14/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024