United States v. Attar ( 1996 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8519
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
AMIR JAMES ATTAR,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 96-6097
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
AMIR JAMES ATTAR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief
District Judge; W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-92-88, CA-95-
548-5)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amir James Attar, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In Appeal No. 95-8519, Appellant appeals from the district
court's orders denying his motion for release on bail and denying
his motion for reconsideration. Appeal No. 96-6097 is Appellant's
appeal from the district court's order denying his motion filed
under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effec-
tive Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat.
1214. We have reviewed the records in these appeals and the dis-
trict court's opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for
release pending appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Attar, Nos. CR-92-88; CA-95-548-5 (E.D.N.C.
Oct. 13, 1995; Oct. 27, 1995; & Nov. 9, 1995). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3