Clark v. Nixon ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1802
MICHAEL CRAIG CLARK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JONATHAN NIXON; JEFF PROCTOR; STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA; DONALD HOBBS; KENT CHAPPELL; CLIFF
HOBBS; PAUL COPELAND; WALLY HOBBS; CHAD
MATTHEWS; ALAN CORPREW; SCOTT WAFF,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MARK DAVIS; JOHN V. MATTHEWS; PERQUIMANS
COUNTY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-02-47-2-H-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2004 Decided: December 9, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Craig Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Carpenter Prentiss,
HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, Elizabeth City, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael Craig Clark appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his civil complaint alleging violations of 42
U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Clark v. Nixon, No. CA-02-47-2-H-1
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2002 & June 3, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -