David Laux v. Board of Supervisors ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-1018
    DAVID J. LAUX; TARA K. LAUX, a/k/a Tara K. Long,
    Plaintiffs – Appellants,
    v.
    BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; JAMES W.
    PATTERSON, Director, Fairfax County Department of Public
    Works and Environmental Services,
    Defendants – Appellees,
    and
    THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
    Defendant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.     Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:15-cv-01334-LMB-MSN)
    Submitted:   June 2, 2016                  Decided:   June 10, 2016
    Before KING, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David J. Laux, Tara K. Laux, Appellants Pro Se. David P.
    Bobzien, County Attorney, Cynthia A. Bailey Deputy County
    Attorney, Christopher A. Costa, Sara G. Silverman, Assistant
    County Attorneys, FAIRFAX   COUNTY   ATTORNEY’S   OFFICE,   Fairfax,
    Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s
    order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (2012) complaint without prejudice.                      We have reviewed the
    record and      the     contentions     on       appeal   and   find    no   reversible
    error.    Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.                         Laux
    v. Bd. Of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. Va., No. 1:15-cv-01334-
    LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2015); see Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co.,
    
    263 U.S. 413
     (1923); Dist. of Columbia Ct. of App. v. Feldman,
    
    460 U.S. 462
     (1983).         We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and   legal     contentions     are       adequately     presented     in    the
    materials      before    this   court    and       argument     would    not   aid    the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1018

Filed Date: 6/10/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021