Dobson v. Bassett , 122 F. App'x 33 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 04-7352
    MICHAEL DOBSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    K.   J.   BASSETT,   Warden,    Keen   Mountain
    Correctional Center,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.  David G. Lowe, Magistrate
    Judge. (CA-03-939)
    Submitted:   January 31, 2005          Decided:     February 16, 2005
    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Michael Dobson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Ransom Franklin, OFFICE
    OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Dobson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
    order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).*   An appeal may not be taken from the final order in
    a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).           A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).    A    prisoner   satisfies      this   standard    by
    demonstrating     that   reasonable     jurists    would     find    that    his
    constitutional    claims   are   debatable   and   that     any     dispositive
    procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or
    wrong.    See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
    that Dobson has not made the requisite showing.              Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                   We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
    judge under 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c) (2000).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-7352

Citation Numbers: 122 F. App'x 33

Judges: Niemeyer, Gregory, Hamilton

Filed Date: 2/16/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024