James Chancey, Jr. v. North American Trade Schools ( 2011 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2440
JAMES H. CHANCEY, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NORTH AMERICAN TRADE SCHOOLS, INCORPORATED; MATT DALY; EFC
TRADE, INCORPORATED, IV,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00032-WDQ)
Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: August 11, 2011
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James H. Chancey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Hermann Strong,
VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James H. Chancey, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in
this employment discrimination action. We affirm.
With respect to Chancey’s claim of race discrimination
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and
his claim of retaliatory discharge, in violation of Title VII
and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006), we review the district court’s
grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the facts and drawing
reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to
the non-moving party. Bonds v. Leavitt, 629 F.3d 369, 380 (4th
Cir.) petition for cert. filed, 79 U.S.L.W. 3686 (May 31, 2011).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Chancey v. N. Am. Trade Sch. Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00032-WDQ
(D. Md. Nov. 17, 2010).
We deny as moot appellee’s motion to strike filed in
this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2