In Re: Gordon v. , 82 F. App'x 87 ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7114
In Re: REGINALD LEVETTE GORDON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CR-99-24, CA-01-337)
Submitted: November 12, 2003 Decided: December 5, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Levette Gordon, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Levette Gordon petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion
brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of
the district court’s docket sheet reveals that subsequent to the
filing of the mandamus petition in this court, the district court
entered an order granting in part and denying in part the
Government’s motion for summary judgment, granting in part Gordon’s
§ 2255 motion, and dismissing all other outstanding motions as
moot. See United States v. Gordon, Nos. CR-99-24; CA-01-337
(W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2003). Accordingly, because the district court
has recently decided Gordon’s case, we deny the mandamus petition
as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2