Fuller v. Eichor ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 99-7388
    HENRY A. L. FULLER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PERRY  EICHOR,   Director;   CAPTAIN   LOFTUS;
    LIEUTENANT DAVIS; LIEUTENANT SIMPSON; SERGEANT
    ROBINSON;   SERGEANT   VANDERMOSEN;   SERGEANT
    MCKENNEY; SERGEANT MERRIT; OFFICER COCH; OFFI-
    CER ANDERSON; OFFICER RICHARDSON; OFFICER
    MAYBRE; OFFICER PHILLIPS; OFFICER JANE DOE;
    MEDICAL SUPERVISORS NURSE AUSTIN AND NURSE
    MAGGIE, each individually as employees of the
    Greenville County Detention Center,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
    (CA-98-1770-6-24)
    Submitted:   December 16, 1999         Decided:     December 30, 1999
    Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
    cuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Henry A. L. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr.,
    CLARKSON, FORTSON, WALSH & RHENEY, P.A., Greenville, South Caro-
    lina; Matthew Philip Utecht, HAYNSWORTH, MARION, MCKAY & GUERARD,
    Greenville, South Carolina; Thomas Carl Cofield, BARNES, ALFORD,
    STORK & JOHNSON, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Henry Fuller appeals the district court’s order denying relief
    on his 
    42 U.S.C.A. § 1983
     (West Supp. 1999) complaint.     We have
    reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
    magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Fuller v. Eichor, No. CA-98-1770-6-24 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1999).   We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-7388

Filed Date: 12/30/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014