Corbitt v. Bennett , 258 F. App'x 555 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7190
    DEMARCUS CORBITT,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    BOYD BENNETT,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:06-cv-00829-NCT)
    Submitted:   December 13, 2007          Decided:     December 20, 2007
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Demarcus Corbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Demarcus Corbitt seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.               The
    order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.        28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).          A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                 28 U.S.C.
    §   2253(c)(2)   (2000).   A   prisoner   satisfies      this   standard    by
    demonstrating    that   reasonable     jurists   would     find   that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.        Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).          We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Corbitt has not
    made the requisite showing.     Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability, deny Corbitt’s motion for leave to proceed in forma
    pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.       We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7190

Citation Numbers: 258 F. App'x 555

Judges: Niemeyer, Motz, Shedd

Filed Date: 12/20/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024