Furtado v. DeWolfe ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6267
EDSON FURTADO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAUL DEWOLFE, Director of Public Defender,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv-
03379-RWT)
Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. DeWolfe, No.
8:07-cv-03379-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -