Mirza Kunjundzic v. United States , 514 F. App'x 346 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-110
    MIRZA KUNJUNDZIC, a/k/a Mirza Kujundzic,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Permission to Appeal from the United States
    District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cr-00639-PJM-2)
    Submitted:   March 11, 2013                 Decided:   March 18, 2013
    Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mirza Kunjundzic, Appellant Pro Se. Albert David Copperthite,
    Sujit Raman, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore,
    Maryland; James Andrew Crowell, IV, Christen Anne Sproule,
    Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
    Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Mirza    Kunjundzic    petitions   for     permission      to   appeal
    the district court’s order denying the relief he requested in
    his pro se pretrial motions in his criminal case.                     See Fed. R.
    App. P. 5.       The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal for
    lack of jurisdiction.          This court may exercise jurisdiction only
    over     final   orders,   
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
        (2006),     and       certain
    interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2006);
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
    
    337 U.S. 541
    , 545-46 (1949).               The order Kunjundzic seeks to
    appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
    or collateral order.       See United States v. North Am. Coal Exch.,
    
    676 F.2d 99
    , 100 (4th Cir. 1982).              Accordingly, we grant the
    Government’s      motion   and    dismiss    the     petition    for     lack   of
    jurisdiction.       We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before    this   court   and    argument   would   not   aid    the    decisional
    process.
    PETITION DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-110

Citation Numbers: 514 F. App'x 346

Judges: Floyd, Per Curiam, Shedd, Thacker

Filed Date: 3/18/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/6/2023