Ying Song Lin v. Gonzales , 234 F. App'x 175 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-2258
    YING SONG LIN,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals. (A77-317-130)
    Submitted:   July 18, 2007                 Decided:    July 27, 2007
    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Fengling Liu, LAW OFFICE OF FENGLING LIU, New York, New York, for
    Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Neil R.
    White, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Ying Song Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions
    for    review   of   an    order   of   the    Board   of    Immigration    Appeals
    affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for
    asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
    Against Torture.
    To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility
    for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was
    so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the
    requisite fear of persecution.”               INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 
    502 U.S. 478
    , 483-84 (1992).         We have reviewed the evidence of record and
    conclude that Lin fails to show that the evidence compels a
    contrary result.       Having failed to qualify for asylum, Lin cannot
    meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal.
    Chen    v.   INS,    
    195 F.3d 198
    ,    205      (4th    Cir.   1999);   INS   v.
    Cardoza-Fonseca, 
    480 U.S. 421
    , 430 (1987).
    Accordingly,     we    deny      the   petition   for    review.     We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-2258

Citation Numbers: 234 F. App'x 175

Judges: Wilkinson, Traxler, King

Filed Date: 7/27/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024