Tony Jones v. Warden Zych ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 12-8151
    TONY LAMONT JONES,
    Petitioner – Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN C. ZYCH,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.  Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:12-cv-00496-SGW-RSB)
    Submitted:   March 26, 2013                 Decided:   March 29, 2013
    Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tony Lamont Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Tony   Lamont   Jones,     a    federal       prisoner,      appeals   the
    district court’s orders denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
    (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition and denying his motion to
    alter or amend the judgment.               We have reviewed the record and
    find no reversible error.         Contrary to Jones’s assertions in the
    district court and on appeal, he was not assessed a fine or
    restitution as part of his federal sentence, and any change in
    his ability to pay has no impact on his obligation to serve his
    concurrent sentences of life imprisonment.                  We conclude that the
    district court adequately addressed Jones’s claims and properly
    concluded   that    Jones   failed    to     state    a    cognizable      claim   for
    habeas relief.       Accordingly, we affirm * substantially for the
    reasons stated by the district court.                 Jones v. Zych, Case No.
    7:12-cv-00496-SGW-RSB (W.D. Va. Nov. 26 & Dec. 12, 2012).                          We
    dispense    with    oral    argument       because        the    facts    and   legal
    contentions   are    adequately      presented       in    the   materials      before
    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    While the district court denied a certificate of
    appealability, we conclude that no certificate of appealability
    is necessary to entertain this appeal, given Jones’s status as a
    federal prisoner. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-8151

Judges: Duncan, Floyd, Per Curiam, Thacker

Filed Date: 3/29/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024