United States v. Phillip Jernigan, Jr. ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7744
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PHILLIP RAY JERNIGAN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:12-cr-00142-RAJ-TEM-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Ray Jernigan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James
Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Ray Jernigan, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a
sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782 to the Sentencing
Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of
discretion. See United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437
(4th Cir. 2016) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Jernigan, No. 2:12-cr-00142-RAJ-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2