Leach v. Canterbury ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7203
WALTER M. LEACH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH UNDERWOOD, Lieutenant; DON PUGH, Cor-
poral; JAMES E. FOX; JERRY CANTERBURY; DEAN
BARNES; TIMOTHY LUIKART; MATTHEW GIBSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STEVEN CANTERBURY; BETTY EWING,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-422-5)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter M. Leach, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Chad Marlo Cardinal, As-
sistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Walter M. Leach, Jr., appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re-
versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Leach v. Canterbury, No. CA-99-422-5 (S.D.W. Va.
Aug. 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2