Brooks v. Culligan ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7079
STEPHAN D. BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. T. CULLIGAN; J. W. BOOTH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CHARLOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-64-3-2MU)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 11, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephan D. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Bayard Aycock, III,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Stephan D. Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Brooks v. Culligan, No. CA-99-64-3-2MU
(W.D.N.C. filed June 21, 2000; entered June 27, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2