Meade v. Prince Georges Polic ( 2000 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7184
MICHAEL MEADE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
CHIEF OF POLICE, Superiors, Executives, Un-
known of the County of Prince George’s and
Unknown Police Officers, in their official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
00-1842-DKC)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 11, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Meade, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael Meade appeals the district court’s order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Meade v. Prince George’s Police Dep’t, No. CA-00-1842-DKC (D. Md.
July 3, 2000). Because Meade may refile his claims should he be
convicted on the pending charges and that conviction be overturned
or called into question by the appropriate court, we modify the
order to reflect a dismissal without prejudice and affirm as modi-
fied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2