Dr. Tiemoko Coulibaly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. ( 2016 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1247
DR. TIEMOKO COULIBALY; DR. FATOU GAYE-COULIBALY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEBORAH
K. CHASANOW, Judge; CHARLES DAY, Magistrate Judge; THEODORE
D. CHUANG, Judge; ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.; FANNIE
MAE; NRT-MID-ATLANTIC TITLE SERVICE, LLC; LONG & FOSTER REAL
ESTATE INC.; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE; FAACS; GUARDIAN FUNDING;
INTEGRATED ASSET SERVICES; SIMCOX AND BARCLAY, LLP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-03276-GLR)
Submitted: June 21, 2016 Decided: June 23, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tiemoko Coulibaly, Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tiemoko Coulibaly and Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action as barred
by res judicata and immunity and for failure to state a claim
under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) (2012). On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellants’ brief. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants’ informal brief does not
challenge with specific argument the bases for the district
court’s disposition, Appellants have forfeited appellate review
of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d
423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We grant Appellants’ motion to seal
medical documentation and deny the motion for transfer of venue.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2