United States v. Rosario ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7565
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
OSCAR APONTE ROSARIO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CR-00-47-4, CA-02-55-4)
Submitted: March 7, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oscar Aponte Rosario, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Aponte Rosario seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Rosario has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003
WL 431659, at *10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2