Monahan v. Burtt , 275 F. App'x 216 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7547
    DREW JOHN MONAHAN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    STAN BURTT, Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (2:05-cv-02201-RBH)
    Submitted:   April 24, 2008                 Decided:   April 28, 2008
    Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Drew John Monahan, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Drew John Monahan seeks to appeal the district court’s
    orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition, and denying
    his motion for reconsideration.                     The orders are not appealable
    unless     a     circuit    justice      or    judge    issues     a     certificate     of
    appealability.        
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).                   A certificate of
    appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the
    denial of a constitutional right.”                  
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).
    A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable
    jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims
    by   the    district       court    is    debatable        or    wrong    and    that   any
    dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise
    debatable.        Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                  We have independently reviewed the
    record     and    conclude       that    Monahan     has   not    made    the    requisite
    showing.       Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
    dismiss the appeal.              We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and     legal     contentions        are    adequately     presented      in   the
    materials        before    the    court       and   argument      would    not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7547

Citation Numbers: 275 F. App'x 216

Judges: King, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkins

Filed Date: 4/28/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024