United States v. Dixon ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 96-7335
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    HERBERT PERRY DIXON, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
    trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-93-153, CA-96-36)
    Submitted:   November 20, 1997            Decided:   December 9, 1997
    Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Herbert Perry Dixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael James Cummings,
    COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
    motion filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (1994) (current version at 
    28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
     (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Dixon, Nos. CR-93-153; CA-96-36 (E.D. Va.
    May 3, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 
    1997 WL 338568
    (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
    sional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-7335

Filed Date: 12/9/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014