United States v. Jones ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7121
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GREGORY JONES, a/k/a Boo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, Chief District Judge.
(CR-95-234, CA-99-186-L)
Submitted: December 20, 2002 Decided: January 8, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)
and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the
record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court
that Jones has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. See United States v. Jones, No. CR-95-234;
CA-99-186-L (D. Md. May 21, 2002; June 27, 2002). Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2