United States v. Currence , 290 F. App'x 556 ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7170
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JABAR EUGENE CURRENCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:00-cr-00388-JRS)
Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 22, 2008
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jabar Eugene Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jabar Eugene Currence appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a
reduction to his sentence based on an amendment to the Sentencing
Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357
F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject
to the discretion of the district court”); United States v. Legree,
205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2