United States v. Randolph ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6539
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES EDWARD RANDOLPH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:03-cv-04159-CMC)
Submitted: July 25, 2006 Decided: August 2, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Todd Hagins,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Randolph appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter
Jurisdiction.”* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Randolph, No. 3:03-cv-04159-CMC
(D.S.C. Feb. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent Randolph’s motion could have been construed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), it would likewise be without
merit. See United States v. Morris, 429 F.3d 65 (4th Cir. 2005).
- 2 -