Hayes v. Burtt , 290 F. App'x 616 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7710
    GARY LEROY HAYES,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    STAN BURTT, Warden; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General for South
    Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.   Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
    (4:06-cv-01951)
    Submitted:   June 25, 2008                 Decided:   August 28, 2008
    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Gary Leroy Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy
    Assistant Attorney General, Samuel Creighton Waters, Assistant
    Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Gary Leroy Hayes seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.           The order
    is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.        
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).          A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).   A   prisoner   satisfies      this   standard    by
    demonstrating    that   reasonable     jurists   would     find   that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.        Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).          We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hayes has not
    made the requisite showing.     Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.            We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7710

Citation Numbers: 290 F. App'x 616

Judges: Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Traxler, Wilkins

Filed Date: 8/28/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024