Patterson v. Richstad ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1350
PATRICIA T. PATTERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
KENNETH A. RICHSTAD, Clerk of Court,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (0:09-cv-02051-MBS)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 10, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann,
DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Patterson v. Richstad, No. 0:09-cv-02051-MBS (D.S.C. filed
Mar. 5; entered Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2