McCracken v. Natale ( 2005 )

PER CURIAM:

Ted Aaron McCracken appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge granting defendant Natale’s motion for summary judgment, and imposing sanctions under Fed.R.CivJP. 11. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCracken v. Natale, No. CA-04-50-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.